Еasily extracted oil peaked in 2005. Now it suggests that dirtier fossil fuels will be burned and energy prices will rise
Despite major oil finds off Brazil's coast, new fields in North Dakota and ongoing increases in the conversion of tar sands to oil in Canada , fresh supplies of petroleum are only just enough to offset the production decline from older fields.
At best, the world is now living off an oil plateau-roughly 75 million barrels of oil produced each and every day-since at least 2005, according to a new comment published in Nature on January 26. ( Scientific American is part of Nature Publishing Group.)
That is a year earlier than estimated by the International Energy Agency-an energy cartel for oil consuming nations.
To support our modern lifestyles-from cars to plastics -the world has used more than one trillion barrels of oil to date. Another trillion lie underground, waiting to be tapped.
But given the locations of the remaining oil, getting the next trillion is likely to cost a lot more than the previous trillion. The "supply of cheap oil has plateaued," argues chemist David King, director of the Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment at the University of Oxford and former chief scientific adviser to the UK government. "The global economy is severely knocked by oil prices of $100 per barrel or more, creating economic downturn and preventing economic recovery."
Nor do King and his co-author, oceanographer James Murray of the University of Washington in Seattle, hold out much hope for future discoveries. "The geologists know where the source rocks are and where the trap structures are," Murray notes. "If there was a prospect for a new giant oil field, I think it would have been found."
King and Murray based their conclusion on an analysis of oil data from the US Energy Information Administration .
Looking at use and production trends, the two note that since 2005 production has remained essentially unchanged whereas prices (a surrogate for demand) have fluctuated wildly.
This suggests to the authors that there is no longer any spare capacity to respond to increases in demand, whether it results from political unrest that cuts supply, as in the case of Libya's political upheaval last year, or economic boom times in growing countries like China . "We are not running out of oil, but we are running out of oil that can be produced easily and cheaply," King and Murray wrote.
Other statistics, however, argue against a plateau. Oil company BP found in its most recent analysis that oil production was actually more than 82 million barrels per day in 2010, higher than the proposed plateau of 75 million. That difference may be the result of the increasing use of "unconventionals"-Canadian tar sands or the natural gas liquids co-produced with oil extraction.
Rising production in the China, Nigeria, Russia and the US also hints that technological improvements may allow greater production from existing fields than the new research suggests.
Plus, the price of oil may argue against any such plateau. Adjusted for inflation, today's $100 per barrel is roughly equivalent to prices in 1981, according to environmental scientist Vaclav Smil of the University of Manitoba. Smil also notes that in the last 20 years enough oil has been found to satisfy the demands of two new consumers-China and India-nations that now import more oil than is consumed by Germany and Japan.
Some of that price stability is the result of increased efficiency - the potentially vast reserve of unused oil.
The US and other developed countries have maintained economic growth while reducing the amount of oil (and other energy) required for that growth, although some of this apparent efficiency has come from outsourcing energy-intensive economic activity, such as steel production. "We have about halved oil intensity since 1981," Smil argues. "We could halve it again, so we could do with so much less oil-why should we panic about producing less, even if that were the case?"
If King and Murray are correct about 2005 marking the end of easily extracted oil, however, then Smil's additional halving of demand, plus conservation and a rapid deployment of alternative energy, would be required to avoid even more economically painful oil price shocks in the future. As it is, the US spent more than $490 billion on gasoline in 2011 -$100 billion more than in 2010, even though the number of miles driven was similar, according to data from the New America Foundation.
An easy-oil plateau is not good news for the climate, either. Harder to extract oil means increased burning of dirtier oil like that from the tar sands-or even dirtier coal . In fact, there are trillions more barrels of carbon-intensive fuel out there in the form of huge coal fields, such as the one currently being brought into production in Mongolia. "There will still be enough CO2 produced to result in significant climate warming," Murray notes.
Even with large supplies of coal and natural gas, the world faces a potential energy shortfall, one reason that the US Department of Energy suggested in a 2005 report (pdf) that a "crash program" to cope with any decline in oil supplies be instituted. The report argued this program should start 20 years before peak global production to avoid "extreme economic hardship.
" That's because it will take decades for any kind of energy transition to occur, as evidenced by past shifts such as from wood to coal or coal to oil.
In fact, King and Murray argue that global economic growth itself may be impossible without a concurrent growth in energy supply (that is, more abundant fossil fuels , to date). "We need to decouple economic growth from fossil-fuel dependence," King adds. "This is not happening due to industrial, infrastructural, political and human behavioral inertia. We are stuck in our ways."